J. D. Vance and Tim Walz battled each other to a statistical tie in the polls. Both even improved their standing with the public in surveys, thanks to their spirited but cordial clash, which was policy-heavy. Though Vance looked and sounded more polished, his refusal to accept the 2020 election results at the end cost him the debate, and could lose his ticket the 2024 election.

Refusing to answer, or even accept, the results of the 2020 election at the end of the debate likely undermined Vance’s generally positive image. It will likely cost his ticket valuable votes that could influence the election, as big of a turning point in a debate as we’ve ever seen. Vance dodged the question, claimed to “care more about the future,” and chose to pick on Kamala Harris for combatting misinformation. It showed not only a dismissive attitude toward one of the darkest days in American history, but a willingness to tolerate, or encourage, similar attempts to overthrow democracy in the near future.

John A. Tures is a professor of political science at LaGrange College in Georgia. He can be reached at jtures@lagrange.edu. His Twitter account is @JohnTures2.